Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2009; v. 80; no. 5; p. 748-754; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.5.748
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, N.
Right arrow Articles by Böse, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ARTICLES: SPECIAL SECTION ON EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING

Rapid Source Parameter Estimations of Southern California Earthquakes Using PreSEIS

Nina Köhler1, Georgia Cua2, Friedemann Wenzel1, and Maren Böse3

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Earthquake early warning (EEW) systems provide real-time estimates of earthquake source and ground motion parameters to users before strong ground shaking occurs at sites of interest (Kanamori et al. 1997; Kanamori 2005). They make use of the fact that the most destructive ground shaking during an earthquake is caused by S- and surface waves, which travel much slower than P waves and also slower than electromagnetic signals carrying warnings to potential users. Real-time information systems can minimize loss of life and property damage and are therefore an important tool in short-term seismic hazard mitigation and disaster management (Wenzel et al. 2001). If an alarm can be issued seconds before the onset of the strong ground motions, automatic emergency actions can be initiated such as slowing down high speed trains or shutting down computers or gas distribution, for instance (Goltz 2002).

EEW systems are of two main types, regional and on-site. The former uses a dense network of seismic stations to locate the earthquake, determine its magnitude, and estimate the ground motion at given sites of interest. The latter uses the observations at a single sensor to estimate the ensuing ground motion at the same site (Kanamori 2005). While regional systems work more accurately, they need more time to estimate earthquake source parameters.

EEW systems are currently operated in Japan (Nakamura 1989; Kamigaichi 2004; Horiuchi et al. 2005; Hoshiba et al. 2008), Taiwan (Wu and Teng 2002), Mexico (Espinosa-Aranda et al. 1995), Turkey (Erdik et al. 2003; Alcik et al. 2009), and Romania (Wenzel et al. 1999; Böse et al. 2007). New algorithms for EEW are being developed and tested in California (Allen and Kanamori . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Geophysical Institute
Karlsruhe University
Hertzstrasse 16
76187 Karlsruhe
nina.koehler@gpi.uni-karlsruhe.de
(N. K.)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose
The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America