|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES: SPECIAL SECTION ON EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING |
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
EEW systems are of two main types, regional and on-site. The former uses a dense network of seismic stations to locate the earthquake, determine its magnitude, and estimate the ground motion at given sites of interest. The latter uses the observations at a single sensor to estimate the ensuing ground motion at the same site (Kanamori 2005). While regional systems work more accurately, they need more time to estimate earthquake source parameters.
EEW systems are currently operated in Japan
(Nakamura 1989;
Kamigaichi 2004;
Horiuchi et al. 2005;
Hoshiba et al. 2008),
Taiwan (Wu and Teng 2002),
Mexico (Espinosa-Aranda et al.
1995), Turkey (Erdik et
al. 2003; Alcik et
al. 2009), and Romania
(Wenzel et al. 1999;
Böse et al.
2007). New algorithms for EEW are being developed and tested in
California (Allen and Kanamori
Geophysical Institute
Karlsruhe University
Hertzstrasse 16
76187 Karlsruhe
nina.koehler@gpi.uni-karlsruhe.de
(N. K.)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |