Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2009; v. 80; no. 5; p. 740-747; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.5.740
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cua, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wiemer, S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ARTICLES: SPECIAL SECTION ON EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING

Real-time Performance of the Virtual Seismologist Earthquake Early Warning Algorithm in Southern California

Georgia Cua1, Michael Fischer1, Thomas Heaton2, and Stefan Wiemer1

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
The Virtual Seismologist (VS) method is a Bayesian approach to regional network-based earthquake early warning (EEW) that estimates earthquake magnitude, location, and the distribution of peak ground motion using observed ground motion amplitudes, predefined prior information, and appropriate attenuation relationships (Cua 2005; Cua and Heaton 2007). The application of Bayes's theorem in earthquake early warning (Cua 2005) states that the most probable source estimate at any given time is a combination of contributions from prior information (possibilities include network topology or station health status, regional hazard maps, earthquake forecasts, the Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-frequency relationship) and a likelihood function, which takes into account observations from the ongoing earthquake. Prior information can be considered relatively static over the timescale of a given earthquake rupture. The changes in the source estimates and predicted peak ground motion distribution, which are updated each second, are due to changes in the likelihood function as additional arrival and amplitude data become available. The potential use of prior information differentiates the VS approach from other regional, network-based EEW algorithms, such as ElarmS (Allen and Kanamori 2003).

Implementation of the VS algorithm in California is an ongoing effort of the Swiss Seismological Service (SED) at ETH Zurich. We prioritized the development of codes involved in real-time data processing, which corresponds to the likelihood function in our Bayesian framework; code development to implement the contribution of prior information is to follow. The VS algorithm is one of three early warning algorithms being implemented and tested in real time as part of the California Integrated Seismic Network (CISN) early warning project; the other two are the ElarmS algorithm of Allen and Kanamori (2003) and the onsite algorithm of Wu and Kanamori (2005). These algorithms send reports to the Southern California Earthquake . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Swiss Seismological Service
ETH Zurich
Switzerland
georgia.cua@sed.ethz.ch
(G. C.)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose
The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America