Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2009; v. 80; no. 5; p. 682-693; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.5.682
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Böse, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ARTICLES: SPECIAL SECTION ON EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING

The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview

Richard M. Allen1, Paolo Gasparini2, Osamu Kamigaichi3, and Maren Böse4

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
The term "earthquake early warning" (EEW) is used to describe real-time earthquake information systems that have the potential to provide warning prior to significant ground shaking. This is possible by rapidly detecting the energy radiating from an earthquake rupture and estimating the resulting ground shaking that will occur later in time either at the same location or some other location. Warning times range from a few seconds to a little more than a minute and are primarily a function of the distance of the user from the earthquake epicenter.

The concept has been around for as long as we have had electric communications (e.g., Cooper 1868), but it is only in the last two decades that the necessary instrumentation and methodologies have been developed (e.g., Nakamura 1988; Espinosa-Aranda et al. 1995). The last five years in particular have seen a rapid acceleration in the development and implementation of EEW, fueled by a combination of seismic network expansion, methodological development, and awareness of the increasing threat posed by earthquakes paired with desire by the seismological community to reduce risk.

This special issue of Seismological Research Letters is intended to facilitate communication of EEW methodologies and experiences in implementation. It complements the special section of Geophysical Research Letters published in March 2009 (Allen, Gasparini, and Kamigaichi 2009). Together, these collections of papers describe the science, engineering, and societal considerations of the active warning systems in Mexico, Japan, Taiwan, Turkey, and Romania and detail the development and testing of methodologies in the Unites States, Europe, and Asia (Figure 1). This introductory paper summarizes this content to provide an overview of EEW status around the world. We provide a summary of the various early warning methodologies and then describe the active implementation of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Dept. of Earth and Planetary Science
University of California, Berkeley
307 McCone Hall
Berkeley, California 94720 U.S.A.
rallen@berkeley.edu
(R. A.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America