Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2009; v. 80; no. 5;
p. 673-674; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.5.673
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
Seismic Hazard vs. Seismic Risk
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.
|
The world is full of uncertainties, ranging from climate change, financial
markets, natural disasters, terror attacks, and personal health to the
measurements of the most fundamental elements of all: time and space. Dealing
with uncertainty is a given in life, and any decision is always made under a
certain degree of uncertainty. Risk is one of the most important concepts for
dealing with uncertainty in decision making. Another important concept
associated with risk is hazard. Hazard is a natural or man-made phenomenon
that has the potential to cause harm (i.e., social or economic
consequences). Hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, and floods, for example,
are natural hazards, whereas car crashes, chemical spills, train derailments,
and terror attacks are man-made hazards. Risk, on the other hand, is the
probability of harm if someone or something is exposed to a hazard. Similarly,
seismic hazard and seismic risk are fundamentally different.
Seismic hazard is a natural phenomenon such as ground shaking, fault rupture,
or soil liquefaction that is generated by an earthquake, whereas seismic risk
is the probability that humans will incur loss or damage to their built
environment if they are exposed to a seismic hazard. In other words, seismic
risk is an interaction between seismic hazard and vulnerability (humans or
their built environment). In general, seismic risk can . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Zhenming Wang
Kentucky Geological Survey
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky 40506 U.S.A.
zmwang@email.uky.edu
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America