Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; January/February 2009; v. 80; no. 1; p. 26-30; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.1.26
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jakka, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Quake-Catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons

Elizabeth S. Cochran1, Jesse F. Lawrence2, Carl Christensen2, and Ravi S. Jakka1

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
The Quake-Catcher Network (QCN) is a seismic network that implements distributed/volunteer computing with the potential to provide critical earthquake information by filling in the gaps between traditional seismic stations. Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors detect vibrations within the frequency range of local seismic waves (0.1–20 Hz), so any internet-connected computer with an internal or external MEMS accelerometer can become a strong-motion seismic station. The QCN, a distributed computing project, uses idle computer cycles and MEMS sensors to increase the number of seismic stations, which may soon provide faster and more accurate detection and characterization of moderate to large earthquakes. We present accelerograms and triggering analysis of an Mb 5.1 earthquake recorded by laptop MEMS accelerometers during early testing of the QCN system. In addition, we present here the advantages of distributed computing and MEMS accelerometers for seismic monitoring, as well as basic triggering algorithms.

The QCN capitalizes on the main advantage of distributed computing—achieving large numbers of processors with low infrastructure costs—to provide a dense, large-scale seismic network. While MEMS accelerometers are less sensitive than typical broadband or short-period sensors, a higher number of stations is advantageous for both the study of earthquakes and, potentially, earthquake early warning (Allen and Kanamori 2003; Wurman et al. 2007). Volunteer computing reduces overhead by limiting instrument, operation, and maintenance costs associated with traditional seismic networks (Anderson et al. 2002).

Distributed computing brings many advantages to the field of seismology. Data are analyzed on an individual's laptop or desktop, and only minimal data are transferred to a central server for further analyses. This differs from the traditional approach of uploading continuous waveform data to a central server for analysis (Allen and Kanamori 2003; Wurman et al. 2007). By pushing the analysis to the sensor level, a greater . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Department of Earth Sciences
University of California at Riverside
Riverside, California 92521 U.S.A.
cochran@ucr.edu
(E.S.C.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America