Seismological Research Letters; January/February 2009; v. 80; no. 1;
p. 26-30; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.1.26
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
The Quake-Catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons
Elizabeth S. Cochran1,
Jesse F. Lawrence2,
Carl Christensen2, and
Ravi S. Jakka1
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.
|
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
The Quake-Catcher Network (QCN) is a seismic network that implements
distributed/volunteer computing with the potential to provide critical
earthquake information by filling in the gaps between traditional seismic
stations. Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors detect vibrations
within the frequency range of local seismic waves (0.1–20 Hz), so any
internet-connected computer with an internal or external MEMS accelerometer
can become a strong-motion seismic station. The QCN, a distributed computing
project, uses idle computer cycles and MEMS sensors to increase the number of
seismic stations, which may soon provide faster and more accurate detection
and characterization of moderate to large earthquakes. We present
accelerograms and triggering analysis of an Mb 5.1
earthquake recorded by laptop MEMS accelerometers during early testing of the
QCN system. In addition, we present here the advantages of distributed
computing and MEMS accelerometers for seismic monitoring, as well as basic
triggering algorithms.
The QCN capitalizes on the main advantage of distributed
computing—achieving large numbers of processors with low infrastructure
costs—to provide a dense, large-scale seismic network. While MEMS
accelerometers are less sensitive than typical broadband or short-period
sensors, a higher number of stations is advantageous for both the study of
earthquakes and, potentially, earthquake early warning
(Allen and Kanamori 2003;
Wurman et al. 2007).
Volunteer computing reduces overhead by limiting instrument, operation, and
maintenance costs associated with traditional seismic networks
(Anderson et al.
2002).
Distributed computing brings many advantages to the field of seismology.
Data are analyzed on an individual's laptop or desktop, and only minimal data
are transferred to a central server for further analyses. This differs from
the traditional approach of uploading continuous waveform data to a central
server for analysis (Allen and Kanamori
2003; Wurman et al.
2007). By pushing the analysis to the sensor level, a greater
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
Department of Earth Sciences
University of California at
Riverside
Riverside, California 92521 U.S.A.
cochran@ucr.edu
(E.S.C.)
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America