Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; November/December 2008; v. 79; no. 6; p. 806-815; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.79.6.806
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Srivastava, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Gujarat (India) Seismic Network

Sumer Chopra, R. B. S. Yadav, Hardik Patel, Santosh Kumar, K. M. Rao, and B. K. Rastogi
Institute of Seismological Research, Gandhinagar (Gujarat), India

Abdul Hameed and Sanjay Srivastava
Gujarat Engineering Research Institute, Vadodara (Gujarat), India

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
The 26 January 2001 (Mw 7.7) Bhuj earthquake, in the Kachchh region of Gujarat, India, caused 13,819 deaths, U.S. $10 billion in economic losses and damaged more than 1 million houses (Gupta, Purnachandra Rao, et al. 2001, Gupta, Harinarayana, et al. 2001; Rastogi et al. 2001). The city of Bhuj and neighboring villages were most affected. The damage can be seen as far as Ahmedabad, 240 km from the epicenter, where 69 reinforced buildings collapsed (Department of Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee 2001). Gujarat and the adjoining region falls under all four seismic zones—V, IV, III, and II—of the seismic zoning map of India (Bureau of Indian Standards 2002), with likely earthquakes of magnitude 8, 7, 6, and 5, respectively. It is one of the most seismic-prone intracontinental regions in the world. It has experienced two large earthquakes of magnitude Mw 7.8 (Johnston and Kanter 1990) and 7.7, in 1819 and 2001, respectively, and seven earthquakes of magnitude M ≥ 6.0 (Figure 1) during the past two centuries (Quittmeyer and Jacob 1979; Rastogi 2001, 2004). The intense aftershock activity of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake is still continuing. Through March 2008, 14 aftershocks with M 5.0–5.8, about 200 aftershocks with M 4.0–4.9, about 1,600 aftershocks with M 3.0–3.9, and several thousand aftershocks with M < 3 have been recorded (Mandal and Johnston 2006; Mandal 2007). Regional seismicity has also increased with M ≤ 5 earthquakes and associated foreshock-aftershock sequences. At the time of the earthquake, the Kachchh region had only one seismic observatory at Bhuj operated by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the primary agency in the country for routinely monitoring earthquakes through its national seismological network. In the past, a few analog . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Institute of Seismological Research
Near Police Bhawan, Sector-18
Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382018, India
sumer.chopra@gmail.com
(S.C.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America