Seismological Research Letters; November/December 2008; v. 79; no. 6;
p. 797-805; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.79.6.797
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
Amplitude and Q of 0S0 from the Sumatra Earthquake as Recorded on Superconducting Gravimeters and Seismometers
Yan Xu,
David Crossley, and
Robert B. Herrmann
Saint Louis University
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.
|
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
It has been known for some time that superconducting gravimeters (SGs) can
provide excellent recordings of the seismic normal modes. Studies by Banka and
Crossley (1999) and van Camp
(1999) established the low
noise level of SGs in the seismic normal mode band, especially at periods
longer than 100 s. In an extensive study of all the currently operating SGs
(about 18), Rosat et al.
(2003) showed that the best
SGs have lower noise than the New Low Noise Model
(Peterson 1993) at periods
longer than 1,000 s. Also, several studies have compared the performance of
SGs and broadband seismometers at long periods and shown that the correction
of meteorological influence on the SGs can be more effective than on
seismometers (Freybourger et al.
1997; Hinderer et al.
2002). Zürn and Widmer-Schnidrig
(2006) demonstrated the need
to correct seismometers for pressure effects at long periods. In the frequency
domain the sensitivity of SGs reaches 1 nanogal
(10–11ms–2) or less, especially at periods
longer than 100 s. Widmer-Schnidrig
(2003) summarized the
advantages of using SGs for long-period seismology, noting that in addition to
sensitivity the SGs are calibrated to DC with an amplitude accuracy of better
than 0.1%. Here we combine and compare, for the first time, seismic data from
the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) Data Management
System and data from SGs contributing to the Global Geodynamics Project (GGP)
(Crossley et al.
1999).
The 26 December 2004 Sumatra earthquake is the largest event to be recorded
both by the Global Seismographic Network (GSN) and SGs, with a magnitude
larger than 9.0. It therefore provides a very good opportunity to test the
calibration levels of our instruments
(Davis et al. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Saint Louis University
Saint
Louis, Missouri 63108
USA
yxu3@eas.slu.edu
(Y.
X.)
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America