Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; July/August 2008; v. 79; no. 4; p. 554-561; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.79.4.554
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekström, G.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Measurements of Seismometer Orientation at USArray Transportable Array and Backbone Stations

Göran Ekström
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY

Robert W. Busby
Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, Washington, DC

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Modern broadband seismometers generally have well-known and stable instrument parameters. Typically, the manufacturer's specifications indicate that the gain of each component of a three-component seismometer is known to within 1% and that the orthogonality of the components is true to within a fraction of a degree. Such precision makes possible many types of quantitative seismological analyses that were difficult with earlier instruments. In particular, different components of earlier three-component seismometers did not necessarily have the same response functions (e.g., free period of the seismometer), making any analysis based on the rotation of ground motion into the transverse and longitudinal directions difficult. Such technical problems have now largely been overcome in the most common broadband instrumentation, and it is routine to perform rotational transformations of the horizontal components of motion in modern seismological analyses, such as earthquake source investigations, S and SKS splitting studies, receiver-function determinations, and body- and surface-wave-polarization studies.

An essential station variable for the rotational transformation of horizontal components of motion is the geographical orientation of the original components in the horizontal plane. Horizontal seismometers are typically installed with output sensitivity aligned to the north-south and east-west directions, and the standard names of seismometer channels (e.g., BHN, BHE) reflect this convention. Nontraditional orientations are common for borehole and ocean-bottom seismometers, for which it is cumbersome or impossible to install the seismometer with a specified orientation, and the orientation is instead determined after deployment. In general, instruments with nontraditional orientations have channel names that reflect this (e.g., BH1, BH2). Regardless of how the seismometer is oriented at installation, the azimuths of sensitivity of the horizontal components are subsequently distributed as auxiliary data. In the SEED convention, as well as in other data distribution formats, the precision of this parameter is given to at . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
61 Route 9W
Palisades, New York 10964, U.S.A.
ekstrom@ldeo.columbia.edu
(G.E.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America