Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; November/December 2007; v. 78; no. 6; p. 591-599; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.78.6.591
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Aftershock Investigation in the Andaman-Nicobar Islands: An Antidote to Public Panic?

O. P. Mishra1, O. P. Singh1, G. K. Chakrabortty2, J. R. Kayal1, and D. Ghosh2

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    SUMMARY
 
Public panic prevailed in every part of the Andaman and Nicobar Iislands of India following the megathrust Sumatra earthquake (Mw 9.3) on 26 December 2004. In this article, we present a very brief analysis of our continuous three-month (January-March 2005) monitoring and recording of aftershock data following the main earthquake to show how this endeavor reduced public panic and constituted an important ingredient to a disaster management program for the Andaman-Nicobar region. Monitoring was conducted using six short-period three-component temporary digital seismograph stations set up in different parts of the Andaman and Nicobar islands. Our findings demonstrate that 1) there was no aftershock gap zone as recorded by the far-distant seismographic network, hence negating the possibility of immediate strong quakes in the Andaman and Nicobar islands; 2) there was no strong shaking at full moon (26 January 2005) due to tidal stresses, although the rate of aftershock activity increased by about 31% from the events of the preceding day; 3) there is a north-south trending 850 x 350-km2 rupture area beneath the Andaman and Nicobar islands; and 4) eruptions of mud at the Baratang volcanic zone and lavas at the Barren volcanic zone occurred because of strong shaking due to the mainshock and a series of aftershock clusters within 100 km of the individual volcanic zones. These eruptions may continue for a couple of years, until the aftershock sequence ceases. We show that this new dataset from the local seismographic network constituted an important factor in reassuring the coastal people and islanders about imminent dangers from future earthquakes and tsunamis, and we propose geochemical tests of the erupted mud samples from the Baratang volcanic zone, with geophysical exploration followed by drilling, to ascertain the presence of oil and gas reserves and the phenomenon of gas seepage under the land . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Central Geophysics Division
Geological Survey of India
Kolkata 700016,India
niom_mishra2005@yahoo.co.in
(O.P. M.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America