Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rautian, T. G. Articles by Kendall, A. D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Origins and Methodology of the Russian Energy K-Class System and Its Relationship to Magnitude Scales

Kazuya Fujita, Kevin G. Mackey, and Anthony D. Kendall
Department of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
The size of local and regional earthquakes in the former Soviet Union (USSR) has been given by the energy class (K-class) system since the late 1950s. K-class was originally developed as a rapid and simple means of estimating the radiated energy (E) from an earthquake and was defined as

K = log₁₀ E (in joules).

The nature, origin, and methodology of this system are poorly known to Western seismologists studying Soviet and Russian seismological data, and yet are of great interest and importance to those conducting detailed research on the seismicity of the former USSR. Since its inception, K-class has been the primary means of quantifying the size of small events in the former USSR and continues to be used for that purpose today. In most of this region, scientists employed the method of Rautian (1960), using the maximum horizontal (for the S wave) and vertical (for the P wave) amplitudes, which became the standard for local and regional networks in the early 1960s. In this paper, we describe the origins and basic principles of the energy class system, as well as the methodology generally used today by the regional networks (figure 1) of the states of the former USSR.

	HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

 
Shortly after World War II, between 1946 and 1949, three large earthquakes occurred in Soviet Central Asia and triggered an intense study of seismicity. After the magnitude 7.4 Khait earthquake of 10 July 1949, the Geophysical Institute (now the Institute of Physics of the Earth) of the USSR dispatched an expedition to Garm, Tajikistan (figure 1), to deploy a temporary network around the epicentral region. This Complex Seismological Expedition (CSE), which included the senior authors of this paper (Khalturin and Rautian) at its inception, became permanent in 1954.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]

Department of Geological Sciences
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA
fujita@msu.edu
(K.F.)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Dineva and R. Mereu Energy Magnitude: A Case Study for Southern Ontario/Western Quebec (Canada) Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 136 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]