Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2007; v. 78; no. 5; p. 519-520; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.78.5.519
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Candidate Statements 2007 SSA Board of Directors

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    Rick Aster
 


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (126K):



 
 
Professor of Geophysics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

Principle fields: earthquake and volcano seismology; seismic imaging; instrumentation

In many ways these are extraordinary and promising times for seismology. As SSA begins its second century as a diverse, mature, and international society with a flagship set of publications, our field is undergoing an historic transition from data-poor to data-rich science. This development is attributable both to unprecedented and still-improving facilities, and also simply to the accruing time span of our discipline (e.g., in 2004 we obtained the first-ever global digital recordings of a magnitude 9+ earthquake). We are also making significant (although slower) community progress on essential computational capabilities for using these data via improving forward and inverse methodologies that incorporate diverse observables and more realistic physics and structures. These efforts must be sustained. However, while these are relatively good times for data and critical facilities, we are ironically facing a crunch in the essential NSF, DOE, USGS, and other research and educational funds that both support our core scientific enterprise and attract, train, and retain the next generation of seismologists. A principal emphasis of SSA must be to engage persuasively at the highest levels of government to sustain and increase research funding. These efforts should support core funding for seismology and engineering as well as for emerging multidisciplinary fields that can expand the contributions of seismology.


    Art Frankel
 


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (106K):



 
 
U.S. Geological Survey

Principal fields: seismic hazard assessment, earthquake ground motions

I would like to continue as a director of SSA so that I can further encourage links between scientific research and practical measures that reduce earthquake risk and increase public safety. I think this is a particularly exciting and fruitful time for . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America