Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; July/August 2007; v. 78; no. 4; p. 415-416; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.78.4.415
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malhotra, Dr. P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

OPINION

Seismic Hazard Analysis for Building Codes

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The purpose of seismic design is to reduce risk to life and property from future earthquakes. Risk is defined as the probability of a loss; normally, an increase in the seismic design load reduces the seismic risk. The current approach toward seismic design is to reduce the risk at individual locations (site-specific risk) to an acceptable level. This approach is reasonable from the perspective of a building owner, but it is not reasonable from the perspective of an entire community, because it does not ensure that the risk to multiple locations affected by the same earthquake (aggregate risk) is also reduced to an acceptable level.

The site-specific and the aggregate risks do not always go hand-in-hand. For example, if a region is affected only by small but frequent earthquakes, the probability of significant loss at a given location is high due to the high probability of an earthquake happening close to that location. However, the probability of a significant aggregate loss is low because each small earthquake will affect only a few locations. On the other hand, if the same region is affected only by large but rare earthquakes, the probability of a significant loss at a given location is low due to the low probability of strong shaking at that location, but the probability of a significant aggregate loss is high because the large earthquake will . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.

FM Global
1151 Boston-Providence Turnpike
Norwood, Massachusetts 02062 USA
praveen.malhotra@fmglobal.com







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America