Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pujol, J. Articles by Rydelek, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A Reanalysis of Anomalous Acoustic Signals Recorded by the CERI Seismic Network on 28 January 2004

Paul Rydelek
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Japan

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
We reanalyzed the arrival-time data from an unknown source recorded on 28 January 2004 (UTC) by 20 stations of the Center for Earthquake Research and Information (CERI) seismic network. As discussed by Lin and Langston (2006), the recorded signals were probably generated by an acoustic source, which they modeled as an explosion. As shown here, the data are better explained by a fireball source.

For our analysis we used the inversion software developed by Pujol et al. (2005). Assuming that the speed of sound (c) in air is constant and known and the fireball trajectory is a straight line, this software allows the determination of the velocity of the fireball (v), assumed constant, and the following parameters used to describe the trajectory: the horizontal coordinates (x₀, y₀) of the end point (P) and the corresponding time (t₀), the azimuth of its horizontal projection (), and the angle with the vertical () (figure 1).

The inversion software was applied to a fireball recorded in northeast Arkansas in 2003, to two fireballs recorded in Japan, and to another one recorded in the Czech Republic, and comparison of the theoretical and observed isochrones shows that the software performs very well in spite of several simplifying assumptions made in the model for the fireball (Pujol et al. 2005, 2006). It was noted however, that the fireball's velocity cannot be determined uniquely, as it trades off with t₀. The other parameters, however, are more robust. Moreover, under appropriate conditions the angles and can be determined from the isochrones. If they have a clear axis of symmetry, then it determines , while the separation between isochrones is related to by the following relation:

(1)

where . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Department of Earth Sciences
University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152 USA
jpujol@memphis.edu
(J.P.)

National Research Institute for Earth Science
and Disaster Prevention
3-1 Tennodai
Tsukuba, Japan 305-0006
prydelek@memphis.edu
(P.R.)