|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
Within a range of 300 km the event was well-recorded by the seismic network of the British Geological Survey (BGS) in the United Kingdom (Baptie 2006). A local magnitude of 2.4 was determined by BGS from these records. At larger distances the signal to noise ratio was not sufficient to detect the seismic waves emanating from the explosions due to the weak ground coupling.
Generally, explosions such as these are easily detected at larger distances by the microbarographs of infrasound arrays, which measure the change in air pressure in the subaudible frequency range (i.e., http://www.geology.smu.edu/~seismic/infrasound/index.html). Most of the current infrasound stations around the globe have been installed under the framework of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) International Monitoring System (IMS). The infrasound signals are an important addition to seismic recordings in order to discriminate explosive blasts from tectonic events. For example, several infrasound stations in the Netherlands recorded clear signals from the explosions near London (http://www.knmi.nl/VinkCMS/news_detail.jsp?id=30073).
The infrasound acoustic waves, which travel through the atmosphere, can
themselves induce coupled ground motions; these
Earthquake Geology Division
Cologne University
Vinzenz-Pallotti-Str. 26
51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
hinzen@uni-koeln.de
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |