Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pankow, K. L. Articles by Arabasz, W. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Use of ANSS Strong-Motion Data to Analyze Small Local Earthquakes

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
Advances in seismometry and recording systems have greatly increased the range of signals that can be recorded by strong-motion instruments. This increased range has practical implications for observational weak-motion seismology, as we demonstrate in this study. Analog strong-motion instruments, the most common type in use until the 1990s, had an effective bandwidth from 0.1–0.2 Hz to 25–50 Hz and a dynamic range of 40 to 60 dB (Heaton et al. 1989; Trifunac and Todorovska 2001). By contrast, modern 16- and 24-bit digital strong-motion instruments have bandwidths from DC to 80 Hz (at 200 sps) and a dynamic range of 90 to 135 dB (Trifunac and Todorovska 2001).

Another advance in strong-motion instrumentation during the past decade or so has been the development of recorders that can support continuous digital telemetry of the data. Historically, strong-motion data have been recorded on-site in a triggered mode. The triggers usually are set to record potentially damaging ground motions from moderate to large (M > 4) local earthquakes. These data are used mostly by engineers for structural design and by seismologists for modeling fault rupture histories. The continuous telemetry of strong-motion data has been driven primarily by the need for reliable near-real-time information on potentially damaging ground shaking (Kanamori et al. 1997). Fortunately, the continuous telemetry also enables the recording of smaller signals that normally would not trigger the strong-motion instruments, which means that the full range of signals recorded by the modern accelerometers and digitizers can be investigated.

With the deployment of the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS; USGS 1999) beginning in the year 2000, the number of modern continuously telemetered strong-motion instruments throughout the United States has increased greatly. Before ANSS, the only dense network of such instruments in the United States was . . . [Full Text of this Article]

University of Utah Seismograph Stations
135 South 1460 East, Room 705
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0111 USA
pankow@seis.utah.edu
(K. L. P.)
pechmann@seis.utah.edu
(J. C. P.)
arabasz@seis.utah.edu
(W. J. A.)