|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
OPINION |
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Our year of commemorating the centennial of the Seismological Society of America is drawing to a close. We have had an opportunity to reflect on our long and proud history and to take a fresh look at preserving materials from our early years. During this process someone pointed out to me that I have been the chief staffer at SSA for more than one-third of the Society's existence. Once I recovered from the personal implications of that observation, I began to review the many changes I've seen in my years with SSA.
| When I arrived in 1970, membership in scientific societies was viewed as
a civic duty, a special responsibility to support the advancement of one's
field of knowledge.
|
| BSSA Is (Almost) Everything |
|---|
In the early 1970s, funding for nuclear explosion monitoring prompted a
great growth in the number of seismologists and seismic installations. The SSA
membership and the number of papers in BSSA grew substantially, too.
The San Fernando earthquake in 1971 was my first lesson in how funding flows
after a disaster. But even as the science expanded, the Society stayed focused
for
Executive Director, Seismological Society of
America
snewman@seismosoc.org
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Michael BSSA: Worth Thinking About Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 405 - 408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |