Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, D. Articles by Schneider, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Practical Probabilistic Seismic Risk Analysis: A Demonstration of Capability

Trevor Dhu and John Schneider
Geoscience Australia

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
Smith (2005) presents a compelling argument encouraging seismologists to move beyond probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and embrace seismic risk analysis. According to Smith (2005) the results of a seismic risk analysis may take several forms (e.g., average annualized loss or exceedance probability curves) whereby all forms can be derived from "probabilistic estimates of losses for specific portfolios of assets." This paper demonstrates how Australian government agencies already are achieving Smith's proposal by using probabilistic seismic risk analysis (PSRA) to model earthquake risk in Australian cities. The paper provides a brief description of the process for conducting a PSRA and demonstrates typical results for two Australian cities, Newcastle and Perth, located on the eastern and western seaboards, respectively. This work has been conducted at Geoscience Australia, an Australian federal government agency, within a risk modeling group that focuses on the assessment of risk for a range of natural hazards. Experts within the group include seismologists, geophysicists, mathematicians, structural engineers, software engineers, economists, and social scientists. The work has benefited greatly from collaboration with members of the global re-insurance sector, something that also was encouraged by Smith (2005).

The methodology outlined in this manuscript has been coded into a comprehensive tool for PSRA and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) known as the Geoscience Australia's Earthquake Risk Model (EQRM). A complete description of the approach can be found in Robinson et al. (2005), and detailed examples of the work can be found in Fulford et al. (2002) and Sinadinovski et al. (2005) for the Newcastle and Perth regions respectively.

	METHOD: UNDERTAKING A PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS (PSRA)

 
This section compares the event-based approach for PSHA and PSRA with traditional approaches for PSHA and provides a brief description of how building damage can be calculated for an earthquake scenario . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Research School of Earth Sciences
The Australian National University
Building 61 Mills Road
Canberra ACT 0200 Australia
david.robinson@anu.edu.au
(D.R.)

Geospatial and Earth Monitoring Division
Geoscience Australia
GPO Box 378
Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
david.robinson@ga.gov.au
trevor.dhu@ga.gov.au
john.schneider@ga.gov.au
(D.R., T.D., J.S.)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Leonard, D. Robinson, T. Allen, J. Schneider, D. Clark, T. Dhu, and D. Burbidge Toward a better model of earthquake hazard in Australia Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 425(0): 263 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]