Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; July/August 2006; v. 77; no. 4; p. 440-444; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.77.4.440
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The COMPLOC Earthquake Location Package

Guoqing Lin and Peter Shearer
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
This article describes the programs included in the COMPLOC computer program package that are designed to apply the source-specific station term (SSST) method to solve for local earthquake locations using P- and S-wave phase data. These programs can greatly improve the relative location accuracy of nearby events by applying empirical corrections for the biasing effects of three-dimensional velocity structure. They have been tested on data from both the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) and Northern California Seismic Network (NCSN)

The SSST method (Richards-Dinger and Shearer 2000; Lin and Shearer 2005) works by assigning each station a travel-time correction that varies as a function of source position. This approach provides relative location accuracy comparable to master event or hypocentroidal decomposition (Jordan and Sverdrup 1981) methods within compact event clusters, but is applicable to distributed seismicity. It has some similarities to the double-difference algorithm (Waldhauser and Ellsworth 2000, 2002) and can be shown to give comparable results in tests on synthetic data (Lin and Shearer 2005). However, the SSST approach has computational advantages for big data sets because the location and station term parts of the computation are separate, so that large matrix inversions are not necessary. In addition, our implementation of SSST provides the option to use L1-norm misfit measures, which are more robust than least squares in the case of occasional timing errors or bad phase picks.

We implement the SSST approach by selecting nearby events located within a sphere of specified radius rmax around the target event. The station term for the target event is then computed as the median (or mean) residual of these events. Different results will be obtained depending upon the size of the cutoff distance rmax. If rmax is set to a large enough . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92093-0225 U.S.A.
gulin@ucsd.edu
pshearer@ucsd.edu
(G.L., P.S.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America