Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2009; v. 80; no. 5; p. 901-919; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.5.901
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talwani, P.
Right arrow Articles by Durá-Gómez, I.

EASTERN SECTION

Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 2. Complementary Data

The seismotectonic framework associated with the Middleton Place–Summerville seismic zone (MPSSZ) inferred from seismicity data consists of the ~50-km-long, ~N30°E-striking, NW-dipping, Woodstock fault associated with right-lateral oblique strike-slip motion, with a ~6-km-long antidilatational left step near Middleton Place, dividing it into the Woodstock north and south faults. Three ~NW-SE striking reverse faults, two NE dipping and one SW dipping, were recognized within this step. The Woodstock (N) fault lies along the southeast boundary of a buried Triassic basin, and the current seismicity is due to its reactivation. A comparison of this seismotectonic framework using a Geographic Information System shows that it is consistent with available geomorphological, geodetic, shallow stratigraphic (<150 m), seismic reflection and refraction, and potential field data, some of which were used in Durá-Gómez and Talwani (2009) to develop it. It further suggests that ongoing tectonic activity on the faults comprising this framework has resulted in breaking the overlying basalt along the Woodstock fault and in warping of the overlying sediments. Continuous vertical movements along the NW-SE stepover faults has resulted in uplift on the NE and SW bounding faults with the formation of the Mount Holly and Fort Bull domes. We found that these interpretations of complex faulting on multiple faults in the MPSSZ agreed with and explained the observed macroscopic data gathered after the 1886 Charleston earthquake.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
I. Dura-Gomez and P. Talwani
Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 1. Seismological Data
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 883 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America