|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
EASTERN SECTION |
Macroscopic observations following the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina,
earthquake and analyses of instrumentally recorded seismicity between 1974 and
2004 suggest the presence of two or more active faults. In order to more
clearly define the active faults and determine their seismotectonic framework,
instrumentally located hypocenters were relocated using the double-difference
algorithm HypoDD. The revised hypocentral locations were associated with
different faults based on the first motions recorded at different locations.
The result is a plausible framework that shows several important changes from
earlier interpretations. This framework defines a localized stressed volume,
which consists of the
50-km-long
N30°E striking, NW dipping
Woodstock fault associated with oblique right-lateral strike-slip motion with
a
6-km-long antidilatational left step near Middleton Place. Three
NW-SE striking reverse faults, two NE dipping and one SW dipping, were
recognized within this left step; of these, the NE dipping Sawmill Branch
fault zone lying between Middleton Place and Summerville is the most active.
Minor activity was observed on the NE dipping Lincolnville and the SW dipping
Charleston faults. The southernmost Sawmill Branch fault zone also shows
evidence of left-lateral strike-slip motion. The
N55°W trending
Ashley River fault lying between Middleton Place and the Magnolia Plantation
appears to be currently inactive.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Talwani and I. Dura-Gomez Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 2. Complementary Data Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 901 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |