Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; September/October 2009; v. 80; no. 5; p. 883-900; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.5.883
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durá-Gómez, I.
Right arrow Articles by Talwani, P.

EASTERN SECTION

Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 1. Seismological Data

Macroscopic observations following the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake and analyses of instrumentally recorded seismicity between 1974 and 2004 suggest the presence of two or more active faults. In order to more clearly define the active faults and determine their seismotectonic framework, instrumentally located hypocenters were relocated using the double-difference algorithm HypoDD. The revised hypocentral locations were associated with different faults based on the first motions recorded at different locations. The result is a plausible framework that shows several important changes from earlier interpretations. This framework defines a localized stressed volume, which consists of the ~50-km-long ~N30°E striking, NW dipping Woodstock fault associated with oblique right-lateral strike-slip motion with a ~6-km-long antidilatational left step near Middleton Place. Three ~NW-SE striking reverse faults, two NE dipping and one SW dipping, were recognized within this left step; of these, the NE dipping Sawmill Branch fault zone lying between Middleton Place and Summerville is the most active. Minor activity was observed on the NE dipping Lincolnville and the SW dipping Charleston faults. The southernmost Sawmill Branch fault zone also shows evidence of left-lateral strike-slip motion. The ~N55°W trending Ashley River fault lying between Middleton Place and the Magnolia Plantation appears to be currently inactive.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
P. Talwani and I. Dura-Gomez
Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 2. Complementary Data
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 901 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America