Seismological Research Letters; May/June 2009; v. 80; no. 3;
p. 525-538; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.3.525
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
Evaluation of Linear Site-Response Methods for Estimating Higher-Frequency (> 2 Hz) Ground Motions in the Lower Wabash River Valley of the Central United States
The horizontal-to-vertical ratio of ambient noise
(H/V*N) and the time-averaged S-wave
velocity of the upper 30 m of soils and rock at a site
(VS30) were evaluated for their suitability as
techniques for estimating site effects in the lower Wabash River Valley area
of southern Indiana and Illinois. We also calculated the
horizontal-to-vertical ratio of the S wave
(H/V*S) for the southwestern Indiana earthquake
of 18 June 2002 and evaluated its effectiveness for estimating site effects.
The database for the study consisted of new SH-wave seismic
refraction/reflection profiles and ambient noise recordings at several blast
monitor sites that recorded the M 4.5, 18 June 2002 earthquake, as well as the
S-wave arrivals recorded by the blast monitors during the earthquake.
Our results are limited to ground motions > 2 Hz because of the low-cut
frequency of the velocity transducers used in the blast monitor systems. The
shallow seismic refraction/reflection profiles allowed us to determine the
S-wave velocities and soil-bedrock contact geometry, as well as the
depth to bedrock, characteristic frequency, and
VS30. These methods were compared with linear
one-dimensional site amplification approximations. The results of the study
are not encouraging. There is only a weak correlation between the linear 1-D
amplification curves and the site effects predicted by the two
horizontal-to-vertical ratios or the VS30
classification of the site. Likewise, there is poor correlation between the
two horizontal-to-vertical techniques or between
VS30 and the Modified Mercalli intensities
reported for the 18 June 2002 earthquake. The results show that site effects
in southern Indiana and southern Illinois are too complex for single-parameter
characterization; consequently, a better evaluation likely requires a minimum
of site-specific in situ seismic-velocity measurements, geotechnical index
tests, and one-dimensional approximation.
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America