Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; January/February 2006; v. 77; no. 1; p. 74-86; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.77.1.74
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebel, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

EASTERN SECTION

The Cape Ann, Massachusetts Earthquake of 1755: A 250th Anniversary Perspective

The earthquake of November 18, 1755, was experienced over a wide area along the East Coast of North America. It caused considerable damage to masonry chimneys and walls in eastern Massachusetts, eastern New Hampshire, and southern Maine. A reexamination of the felt reports, immediate aftershocks and modern seismicity indicate that the most likely epicenter was about 40 km ENE of Cape Ann, Massachusetts, within a cluster of recent earthquake epicenters. Based on the attenuation of MMI with epicentral distance, the Lg-wave magnitude of the earthquake was about MLg 6.2, corresponding to a moment magnitude of M 5.9. From analyses using modern ground-motion attenuation relations, conversions from MMI, and estimations from the number and severity of damaged chimneys, it is estimated that in Boston this earthquake caused peak ground accelerations of about 0.08 g–0.12 g on soil sites, while the 5%-damped response spectral value at a period of 0.3 sec in Boston may have been as small as 0.09 g or as large as 0.21 g. The Boston ground-motion estimates in this study correspond approximately to the 5% in 50 yr ground motions on the 1996 and 2002 USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
J. E. Ebel, A. M. Moulis, D. Smith, and M. Hagerty
The 2006-2007 Earthquake Sequence at Bar Harbor, Maine
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2008; 79(3): 457 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Environmental and Engineering GeoscienceHome page
C. M. BRANKMAN and L. G. BAISE
Liquefaction Susceptibility Mapping in Boston, Massachusetts
Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America