Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; January/February 2004; v. 75; no. 1; p. 117-131; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.75.1.117
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (33)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Jeter, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

EASTERN SECTION

Distinguishing Tsunami from Storm Deposits in Eastern North America: The 1929 Grand Banks Tsunami versus the 1991 Halloween Storm

Tsunami deposits related to the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake and washover deposits related to the 1991 Halloween storm differ in their sedimentary characteristics and positions on the landscape. Regarding sedimentary characteristics, the tsunami deposits are composed of one to three subunits of massive to fining-upward, very coarse- to fine-grained sand, whereas the storm deposits consist of interbedded and laminated coarse-, medium-, and fine-grained sand, exhibiting delta foreset stratification and subhorizontal, planar stratification with channels. Regarding landscape position, the tsunami deposits occur up to 343 m inland, including landward of tidal ponds, and up to 6 m above mean sea level, as well as 3 m above the barrier-beach bars and related dunes; the wash-over deposits occur up to 94 m inland, immediately landward of barrier-beach bars and in adjacent tidal ponds, and up to 1.2 m above mean sea level but no higher than the barrier-beach bars. These observations compared with those from other studies form the basis of proposed criteria for distinguishing paleotsunami from paleostorm deposits in the geologic record. If paleotsunami deposits can be identified with confidence, they will contribute to assessment of tsunami and seismic hazards along the coast of eastern North America and elsewhere.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. Milia, A. Raspini, and M. M. Torrente
Evidence of slope instabilities and tsunami associated with the 3.5 ka Avellino eruption of Somma-Vesuvius volcano, Italy
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 322(1): 105 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S.V. Donato, E.G. Reinhardt, J.I. Boyce, R. Rothaus, and T. Vosmer
Identifying tsunami deposits using bivalve shell taphonomy
Geology, March 1, 2008; 36(3): 199 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America